News
An opposite sex couple have failed in their bid to be allowed to enter into a Civil Partnership. The couple argued that it was discriminatory to prevent an opposite sex couple entering into a Civil Partnership when same sex couples are allowed to.
The Court did not accept that the restriction preventing opposite sex couples entering into a Civil Partnership was unlawful and held that the UK was not under an obligation to extend Civil Partnerships to heterosexual couples. In so doing the UK has chosen not to follow other countries such as France, the Netherlands, Portugal, South Africa and New Zealand.
Civil Partnerships offer an alternative to marriage allowing couples to make a commitment to each other without perceived social and cultural expectations, traditions and pressures.
Julian hopes that the couple continue their challenge to the Court of Appeal. Not only is there a potential denial of equality of choice but Civil Partnerships could address the lack of financial protection afforded to unmarried couples. Either way legislation to protect the property and financial rights of unmarried couples is urgent and long overdue.