News
A Freezing Injunction preserves a party’s assets, in the interim, until a final judgment in divorce or financial proceedings. It prevents one party from disposing of or dealing with assets.
Disposition includes any conveyancing, giving of gifts, or providing assurances, whether in writing or not. It does not include provisions contained in a will or its codicil.
A person can apply for a freezing injunction before court proceedings (if they can show there is an underlying cause of action), during proceedings or after a final judgment.
A freezing injunction does not provide security over an asset but it prevents a person disposing of the asset.
The types of assets that can be frozen include:
The person whom the injunction would restrict must have control over the assets affected, whether or not he owns them, legally or beneficially. The asset can be held in England and Wales or worldwide.
The person seeking an injunction will need to identify the relevant key assets and be very clear about what these are and their extent.
In practice it is extremely difficult and potentially expensive to obtain a freezing injunction. It has been described as a ‘nuclear weapon’ in the law.
The key factors to be considered before a freezing injunction will be granted are as follows:
The test for a ‘good arguable case’ is not very high. In The Niedersachsen[1] Mustill J held that a “good arguable case” was “one which is more than barely capable of serious argument, but not necessarily one which the judge considers would have a better than 50% chance of success”.
The asset must exist. There must be a risk of dissipation of the asset. The test is objective, and the court will consider evidence whether there is a real risk of dissipation. The person applying for the freezing injunction should provide ‘solid evidence’, unsubstantiated assertions will not be sufficient.
Legislation provides that a freezing injunction will be granted only if it is just and convenient to do so.[2] An application will be refused if the injustice that would be caused to the respondent outweighs the benefit that would be gained by the applicant. A freezing injunction cannot be used to oppress someone, for example, to cause them to cease trading.
An injunction will usually last until final judgment on the case. This will secure the assets until the end of proceedings and stops a person defeating any eventual judgment.
For any further information or any enquiries, please do not hesitate to contact us at Dean Wilson.
Telephone: 01273 249 200
Or fill out our contact form here.
[1] [1983] 1 WLR 1412
[2] S37(1) Senior Courts Act 1981